![]() So it thinks it is out of date, although it obviously isn't (also, "svn st -u" reports nothing, so it too thinks the directory is really up to date). the directory is a revision number behind, after committing the new file). I guess the basic explanation is that this is caused by the mixed revision thing (i.e. > local delete, incoming edit upon update ![]() ![]() Svn: Item '/trunk/test/test_moves/clean3/dir' is out of date I'm not sure whether this is a bug or "as designed": So if anyone remembers, or can shed any light on this, I would very much appreciate it.įollowing up on "tree changes that cause problems for wc-1 (and that I would like to verify if wc-ng will fix)", as in, I saw some other strange behavior. I think I've seen this being discussed before (on the list or in the issue tracker), but can't find it again.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |